Physicochemical Analysis of Peeled, Chemically Treated Onion SamplepH
The pH values of vacuum-packed, chemically treated peeled onion samples during refrigerated storage are presented in Figure 1. The initial pH of the untreated control sample (T0) was 6.08, which decreased to 5.95 by the 21st day. Among the treated samples, T1 (0.05% sodium benzoate) showed a reduction from 6.12 to 5.62, T2 (0.1% sodium benzoate) from 6.08 to 5.54, T3 (0.01% potassium metabisulfite) from 6.18 to 5.37, and T4 (0.08% potassium metabisulfite) from 6.12 to 5.32 over the same period.
A consistent decline in pH was observed across all treatments, with the greatest reduction in T4. This greater acidity is attributed to the preservative action of potassium metabisulfite, which may increase the release of organic acids or alter metabolic activity within the onion tissue. By the end of the storage period, all samples exhibited a slightly acidic pH range (5.32–5.95), with treated samples generally showing lower pH values compared to the control. This trend suggests that chemical preservatives increase acidity, potentially through interactions with onion cellular components.
A lower pH environment is known to inhibit microbial proliferation, particularly that of spoilage bacteria and fungi (Thivya, 2022). Additionally, pH reduction may suppress enzyme activity, thereby minimizing enzymatic degradation during storage. These findings align with those reported by Memon et al. (2020), who observed a similar pH decline in sodium benzoate-treated green onions. Decreased pH may also result from microbial metabolism, enzymatic reactions, or cellular damage (Heard, 2002), all of which can contribute to biochemical changes during cold storage.

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite.
|
Fig.1. pH of the vacuum-packed chemically treated peeled onions stored at 4℃
Total Soluble Solids
Changes in total soluble solids (TSS) of vacuum-packed, chemically treated peeled onions stored at 4 °C are presented in Figure 2. On day 0, the TSS of the untreated control sample was 6.0 °Brix, which increased significantly to 9.9 °Brix by day 21. In the sample treated with 0.05% sodium benzoate (T1), TSS increased from 6.2 to 9.1 °Brix, while the 0.1% sodium benzoate treatment (T2) showed an increase from 6.5 to 9.1 °Brix over the same period. The sample treated with 0.01% potassium metabisulfite (T3) exhibited a rise from 6.7 to 9.7 °Brix, whereas 0.008% potassium metabisulfite (T4) treatment showed an initial value of 6.8 °Brix, followed by a slight decline at the end of storage.
In general, TSS levels increased in most samples during storage, with the highest final value recorded in the control sample and the lowest in T1. The observed increase in TSS can be attributed to the breakdown of complex carbohydrates, such as starch and pectin, into simpler sugars through enzymatic activity during storage, as well as to concentration effects resulting from moisture loss (Shah et al., 2022). However, the rate of TSS accumulation was lower in chemically treated samples, particularly in T1 and T2, likely due to suppressed metabolic and physiological processes resulting from preservative action.

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite.
|
Fig.2. Total soluble solids of the vacuum-packed chemically treated peeled onions stored at 4℃
Titratable Acidity
The titratable acidity (TA) of vacuum-packed, chemically treated, peeled onions increased consistently over the 21-day storage period across all treatments (Figure 3). In the control group, TA rose from 0.21 on day 0 to 0.51 by day 21, suggesting substantial acid development in the absence of preservative treatment. Among the sodium benzoate treatments, sample T1 (0.05% sodium benzoate) demonstrated an initial TA of 0.32, which increased to 0.51 at the end of the storage period. Similarly, sample T2, treated with 0.1% sodium benzoate, showed a comparable trend, with TA rising from 0.31 to 0.51 over the same duration. These results indicate that sodium benzoate, at both tested concentrations, did not markedly alter the progression of acidity when compared to the untreated control.
In contrast, samples treated with potassium metabisulphite showed different TA profiles. Sample T3, containing 0.01% potassium metabisulphite, exhibited a higher initial TA of 0.47, which further increased to 0.59 by day 21. Sample T4 (0.008% potassium metabisulphite) showed a smaller rise in TA, from 0.41 to 0.52 over the storage period. The elevated initial acidity in these samples may reflect the chemical characteristics of potassium metabisulphite or interactions with onion constituents upon treatment. The observed progressive increase in TA across all samples underscores the influence of storage time on acidity development, likely due to metabolic activity, microbial growth, or breakdown of onion components. While chemical treatments appeared to modulate the rate and extent of this increase to varying degrees, none fully inhibited the rise in acidity. These findings are consistent with earlier studies suggesting that both preservation method and storage duration significantly affect the physicochemical stability of fresh-cut produce (Thivya, 2022).

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite .
|
Weight Loss
The weight loss of vacuum-packed, chemically treated peeled onions stored at 4 °C over 21 days is presented in Figure 4. A progressive reduction in sample weight was observed across all treatments, with varying degrees of weight loss by the end of the storage period. The control sample, which did not receive any preservative treatment, exhibited the highest weight loss at 3.78% on day 21.
Among the treated samples, the lowest weight loss was recorded in sample T1, treated with 0.05% sodium benzoate, at 3.25%. This suggests that this concentration of sodium benzoate was most effective in minimizing moisture loss during cold storage. Sample T2 (0.1% sodium benzoate) showed a slightly higher weight loss of 3.52%, indicating a less pronounced protective effect at the increased concentration.
Samples treated with potassium metabisulfite demonstrated moderate weight loss. Sample T3 (0.01% potassium metabisulfite) exhibited a weight loss of 3.67%, while sample T4 (0.008% potassium metabisulfite) showed a weight loss of 3.71%. Although both treatments reduced weight loss compared with the control, their efficacy was lower than that observed with sodium benzoate, particularly in T1.
Weight loss in fresh-cut produce during storage is primarily driven by transpiration and respiration, which are influenced by storage conditions, packaging properties, and the tissue's physiological state. The results of this study are consistent with previous findings, which reported similar trends in chemically treated green onions stored under modified atmosphere packaging (Patil et al., 2024). Furthermore, the magnitude of weight loss is known to be affected by packaging barrier properties, relative humidity, and the surface-to-volume ratio (Bahram-Parvar and Lim, 2018).
The greater weight loss observed in the control sample is attributed to the lack of chemical protection and increased exposure of internal tissues, leading to enhanced moisture evaporation and reduced turgor. This phenomenon is closely associated with firmness degradation and textural deterioration in fresh-cut produce (Shahrajabian et al., 2020). The use of appropriate chemical preservatives thus plays a significant role in maintaining the postharvest quality of minimally processed onions by limiting moisture loss during storage.
Texture Profile Analysis
The firmness of vacuum-packed, fresh-peeled onions stored at 4 °C was assessed over 21 days, and the results are presented in Figure 5. The control sample exhibited a significant decline in firmness from 1.86 N on day 0 to 1.03 N on day 21. Among the treated samples, T1 (0.05% sodium benzoate) initially exhibited the highest firmness (2.62 N), which decreased sharply to 0.51 N by day 21. Sample T2 (0.1% sodium benzoate) had missing values in the original dataset, and thus its trend could not be fully evaluated. For sample T3 (0.01% potassium metabisulphite), firmness declined from 2.45 N to 1.33 N, while sample T4 (0.008% potassium metabisulphite) showed a decrease from 2.42 N to 1.22 N over the storage period.
Firmness generally declined across all samples during storage, likely due to physiological processes such as respiration and transpiration, as well as enzymatic degradation of cell wall components (Thivya, 2022). Specifically, enzymes like pectin methyl esterase and polygalacturonase are known to break down pectin, resulting in textural softening (Bahram‐Parvar and Lim, 2018; Rico et al., 2009). The untreated control sample showed the most pronounced firmness loss, likely due to the absence of chemical preservatives.
In contrast, firmness retention was more evident in the chemically treated samples, particularly in T3 and T4, indicating that potassium metabisulfite was more effective in maintaining texture than sodium benzoate under vacuum storage conditions. These findings suggest that chemical treatments can significantly help preserve the textural integrity of fresh-cut onions during refrigerated storage.
Fig.4. Weight loss of the vacuum-packed chemically treated peeled onions stored at 4℃

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite.
|
Microbial Analysis
The microbial load of vacuum-packed, fresh-peeled onions stored at 4 °C (Fig. 6) was evaluated over 21 days by monitoring total plate count (TPC) and assessing the presence of Escherichia coli and lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Neither E. coli nor LAB was detected in any of the samples during storage, suggesting the effectiveness of hygienic handling and vacuum packaging in preventing the growth of specific pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms. The TPC values increased progressively over time across all samples (Figure X), indicating microbial proliferation during refrigerated storage. In the control group, TPC increased significantly from 2.00×10⁶ CFU/mL on day 0 to 6.70×10⁶ CFU/mL on day 21, indicating a high microbial growth rate in the absence of preservative treatment.
In contrast, sodium benzoate-treated samples exhibited comparatively lower microbial loads. Sample T1 (0.05% sodium benzoate) showed the most effective microbial inhibition, with TPC increasing from 1.25×10⁶ to only 3.50×10⁶ CFU/mL over the storage period. Sample T2 (0.1% sodium benzoate) also reduced microbial growth, with TPC values rising from 1.95×10⁶ to 4.35×10⁶ CFU/mL. These results suggest that sodium benzoate, particularly at 0.05%, exhibits notable antimicrobial activity and may be more effective at lower concentrations, possibly due to a more favorable interaction with the onion matrix at that concentration. Potassium metabisulfite-treated samples demonstrated intermediate antimicrobial effects. T3 (0.01%) and T4 (0.008%) showed similar microbial trends, with TPC values increasing from 2.25×10⁶ to 5.35×10⁶ CFU/mL and from 1.52×10⁶ to 4.65×10⁶ CFU/mL, respectively. Although both treatments delayed microbial growth compared to the control, they were less effective than the sodium benzoate treatments, particularly T1.
The superior antimicrobial efficacy of sodium benzoate may be attributed to its role as a surface sanitizer, where it reduces microbial colonization by interfering with microbial metabolism and altering cell membrane integrity (Artes et al., 2009). Its activity is enhanced under acidic conditions, which is relevant given the gradual increase in titratable acidity observed during storage. This mode of action aligns with previous findings that the inclusion of antimicrobial agents in packaged produce can lower internal pH and intensify disruption of microbial cell membranes, thereby inhibiting growth (Davidson et al., 2015).
Overall, the results demonstrate that vacuum packaging combined with chemical preservation effectively limits microbial proliferation in fresh-cut onions during refrigerated storage. Among the treatments tested, 0.05% sodium benzoate (T1) provided the most substantial antimicrobial protection and may offer a promising strategy for extending the microbial shelf life of minimally processed onions.

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite.
|
Fig.6. Microbial Analysis of the vacuum-packed, chemically treated, peeled onions stored at 4℃
Sensory Analysis
Sensory evaluation of vacuum-packed fresh peeled onions stored at 4 °C (Fig. 7) was conducted using an untrained panel, assessing attributes including odour, texture, colour, taste, appearance, and overall acceptability. Among all samples, T1 (0.05% sodium benzoate) received the highest scores across most parameters, indicating superior preservation of sensory quality. This was followed by T2 (0.1% sodium benzoate) and T3 (0.01% potassium metabisulfite), which also maintained acceptable sensory characteristics throughout the 21-day storage period.
The high acceptability of T1 and T2 can be attributed to the improved firmness, colour retention, and reduced total soluble solids (TSS) content observed in these samples, which align with desirable textural and visual qualities. These findings are consistent with previous studies that reported enhanced sensory stability in chemically treated and vacuum-packed allium vegetables during refrigerated storage (Artes et al., 2009; Patil et al., 2024). Sodium benzoate, in particular, has been noted for its ability to preserve tissue structure and prevent enzymatic browning, contributing to sustained sensory appeal.
In contrast, the control sample, which lacked chemical preservatives, was rated poorly by panelists. Deteriorative changes, including softening, discoloration, and off-odours, negatively impacted its sensory acceptability. These outcomes further highlight the role of chemical preservatives in maintaining the sensory integrity of minimally processed produce under cold storage.
Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between treated and untreated samples across all evaluated sensory parameters. Overall acceptability followed the trend T1 > T2 > T3 > T4 > Control, underscoring the effectiveness of chemical treatments, particularly sodium benzoate, in extending the shelf life and consumer appeal of fresh-cut onions. These results corroborate earlier findings that chemical preservatives combined with vacuum packaging can substantially delay quality deterioration and enhance consumer acceptability (Thivya, 2022; Shahrajabian et al., 2020).

|
T0 – Control (Raw onion)
|
T1 – Onion + 0.05% sodium benzoate
|
|
T2 – Onion + 0.1% sodium benzoate
|
T3 – Onion + 0.01% potassium metabisulfite
|
|
T4 – Onion + 0.08% potassium metabisulfite.
|
Fig.7. Sensory evaluation of the vacuum-packed, chemically treated, peeled onions stored at 4℃